Cellphones are everywhere—including, until recently, in schools.
Since 2023, 29 states, including New York, Vermont, Florida, and Texas, have passed laws that require K-12 public schools to enforce bans or strict limits on students using their cellphones on campus.
Another 10 states have passed other measures that require local school districts to take some kind of action on cellphone usage.
Approximately 77% of public schools now forbid students from having their phones out during class—an increase from the 66% of schools that forbade students from using phones at school in 2015.
Schools across the country are finding different ways to enforce no-phone policies. Some schools have students lock their phones in pouches that only open at the end of the day. Others use simple classroom bins or lockers.
Some research shows that spending a lot of time looking at phones instead of people’s faces can make it harder for children and teenagers to get the basic human skills they need for developing and maintaining friendships and other relationships.
As a scholar of educational leadership, I believe that school is about more than just classes—it’s where young people learn how to get along with others. When phones are put away, students actually start looking at each other and talking again. School hallways and the lunchroom turn into spaces where students learn to resolve conflicts face-to-face and make human connections.
Putting phones away in Ohio
Ohio is an example of a state that has clamped down on students’ cellphone usage over the past 18 months.
In May 2024, Ohio went from suggesting some cellphone guidelines for different schools to adopt to requiring that all public districts limit students’ phone use during class. School districts could choose to allow phones at lunch or between classes.
Many schools began using lockable pouches, plastic bins, or lockers to keep phones out of sight. They still needed to allow some students to have phones for medical reasons, like monitoring blood sugar on an app.
Ohio then adopted an even stricter cellphone use policy in 2025. This new law required all Ohio public school boards to adopt policies by Jan. 1, 2026, that prohibit phone use during the entire school day, including lunch and the time between classes.
A needed break
In the fall of 2025, I surveyed 13 Ohio public school principals from rural, urban, and suburban districts. Principals reported that the partial phone bans increased students’ social interactions and reduced peer conflicts:
- 62% of principals described more verbal, face-to-face socializing during recess, at lunch time, and between classes.
- 68% noted that students can stay on one task for more than 20 minutes without seeking a quick digital break.
- 72% observed a shift from heads-down scrolling to active conversation in common areas such as the cafeteria.
- 61% reported fewer online social conflicts spilling over into the classroom.
A tension for students
In late January 2026, I also surveyed and spoke with 18 Ohio high school students about the new phone bans in place at their schools as part of research that has not yet been published.
Their responses revealed a complex tension between understanding the need for the phone ban and feeling a significant loss of personal safety and autonomy.
A few students said they felt safe knowing a phone in the main office is available for emergencies.
Some students said they felt anxious about not being reachable if there is an emergency—like if a relative were in an accident, or if the younger siblings they care for required their help.
Finally, 13 out of 18 students argued that they should be learning the self-discipline required to balance technology with focus. Students said that phone bans made them feel as though they were children who could not make responsible decisions—rather than young adults preparing for professional environments.
Some students also said that not having their phones made it impossible to fill out college and scholarship applications during the school day, since many application systems require multifactor authentication and require phones to log in.
Lessons from Ohio
Rules are more likely to be respected when students feel they have a voice in the boundaries that affect their daily lives. I think that school leaders could address students’ safety and security concerns in different ways, including by establishing a dedicated family emergency hotline that people can call.
Principals could designate supervised areas where more senior high school students can briefly use their phones for multifactor authentication. School leaders could also offer a specific time window for students to check messages on their phones, or an easy way for the school’s main office to deliver them messages from family.
While these insights from Ohio students and principals offer a helpful starting point, they are just one part of a much larger conversation.
More research is needed to see how these bans affect different types of schools and communities across multiple states. Because every district is different, what works in one town might cause unexpected challenges in another. By continuing to study these effects and listening to everyone involved, especially the students, researchers like myself can figure out how to keep classrooms focused and students interacting without making students feel less safe or less prepared for the adult world.
Corinne Brion is an associate professor in educational administration at the University of Dayton.
This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.
