One of the central mysteries of the brain is how it achieves so much with so little. At any given moment, it processes an entire world of input, pilots a body and generates conscious experience—all with relatively modest energy demands. Traditionally, the brain’s 86 billion neurons are each assumed to be a single “processor,” operating as one computational unit. But for the past few decades, neuroscientists have suspected that a neuron might actually house many processors, making it far more powerful. Now researchers have found the first direct evidence of this in animals, showing that neurons’ many branches, called dendrites, can compute information independently of the cell body.
The study, published in July in Science, shows that dendrites “dramatically expand” the computational capacity of individual neurons and, consequently, of the brain as a whole, says senior author Attila Losonczy, a neuroscientist at the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center. Neurons in textbook diagrams look deceptively simple, with only a handful of dendrites extending from the cell body. In reality, they sprawl wildly into elaborate treelike arbors, allowing a single neuron to receive input from thousands of its neighbors. Scientists once thought these dendrites were little more than “boring cables” that merely passed incoming signals to the cell body for processing, Losonczy says. If this were true, each neuron would essentially be one computational unit.
But dendrites’ sprawling architecture hints at a deeper purpose. “Nature puts a lot of effort and energy to maintain those branched structures,” Losonczy says. For the past 30 years, experiments on lab-grown neurons and excised brain tissue have suggested that dendrites could compute information on their own. To test the idea in living animals, Losonczy’s team used new voltage-imaging technology to record activity from parts of individual neurons in mice’s hippocampi, a brain region involved in memory and navigation. While running on miniature wheels, the mice navigated virtual environments in search of rewards.
On supporting science journalism
If you’re enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.
In familiar environments, activity in the dendrites generally matched that of the cell body. And when the researchers moved the reward around within the familiar surroundings, the cell body adjusted quickly, while certain dendrites retained remnants of the earlier activity. But in an entirely new environment, some dendrites changed their activity to represent the new location before the cell body, which caught up only after repeated exploration. This suggests that the dendrites were computing information on their own, while their ability to preserve traces of the past or get ahead of the cell body raises the possibility that they serve as local “memory devices,” Losonczy says.
The findings reveal how much computation might be happening within a single neuron of a living being. “Perhaps the best analogy is that a neuron itself is already a neural network,” says Antonio Fernandez-Ruiz, a neuroscientist at Cornell University, who was not involved in the new work. Losonczy also suspects that the “nice hierarchical organization” of the dendritic branches might give the brain even more computational power than simply having more neurons acting as single processors.
Beverley Clark, a neuroscientist at University College London, who also wasn’t involved in the new research, thinks that dendrites computing independently allows each neuron to be “super flexible.” For her, there is more to the computational power of the brain than what we currently understand. What’s happening in the cell body captures only one part of the brain’s power. “It’s what you see across the dendritic tree that’s really important,” Clark says.
It’s Time to Stand Up for Science
If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.
SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.
If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.
In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can’t-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world’s best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.
There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.
