Close Menu
    National News Brief
    Wednesday, April 29
    • Home
    • Business
    • Lifestyle
    • Science
    • Technology
    • International
    • Arts & Entertainment
    • Sports
    National News Brief
    Home»Opinions

    Stop holding cancer patients hostage in campus controversies

    Team_NationalNewsBriefBy Team_NationalNewsBriefNovember 17, 2025 Opinions No Comments4 Mins Read
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email


    I am dying of cancer.

    To add insult to personal tragedy, my country’s government has decided to use my illness and that of so many other cancer patients as leverage in the current administration’s battle against higher education.

    Hundreds of millions of cancer research dollars have been canceled or delayed because our government has decided that associated universities’ cultures are not conservative enough, are antisemitic, or have diversity, equity and inclusion policies that the Trump administration finds objectionable.

    The magnitude of such fiscal cuts inevitably results in terminated research programs, operational disruptions, faculty cutbacks, hiring freezes, suspension of new Ph.D. student admissions and ultimately more cancer deaths and suffering. Hundreds of organizations and university research programs have lost or risk losing cancer research grants.  

    This is not a future problem — these funding cuts are having major impacts across the country right now. Rachael Sirianni, a professor at the University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School who researches pediatric brain cancer, recently told The New York Times that National Institutes of Health grant applications she submitted to continue her research were not funded, resulting in the suspension of her work and the layoff of a postdoctoral researcher. A recent “60 Minutes” segment examined the impact on Harvard’s cancer research programs, including the disruption to Joan Brugge’s work on breast cancer prevention, Don Ingber’s research on “organs-on-chips” and David Liu’s development of gene-editing tools that can correct and rewrite defective genes — research that led to lifesaving experimental treatment of a 13-year-old leukemia patient.

    Some universities, most recently Cornell University, have succumbed to government pressure and reached an agreement to restore funding. Harvard, however, sued and secured an order to reinstate funding by successfully challenging the First Amendment constitutionality of the government’s actions. In a Sept. 3 decision, U.S. District Court Judge Allison Burroughs concluded that “ … Defendants used antisemitism as a smoke screen for a targeted, ideologically motivated assault on this country’s premier universities, and did so in a way that runs afoul of the APA (Administrative Procedure Act), the First Amendment and Title VI (of the Civil Rights Act).” The Trump administration is expected to appeal and block future funding to Harvard.

    From a patient’s perspective, the immorality of holding cancer research funding hostage in a political battle over campus culture is much more troubling than the constitutional illegality found by the court. Whether a university settles or fights for its academic independence is somewhat beside the point. Putting cancer research at risk for political reasons is simply wrong.  

    Cancer research is neither conservative nor liberal. Cancer sees no color, race, religion or sexual orientation. No family who suffers with this awful disease should be used as a cudgel to seek revenge or retribution because of political differences. To diminish my life, my hopes and my dreams, as well as the lives, hopes and dreams of so many cancer patients, just to advance a political agenda is simply cruel.

    Those politicians who allow — or worse, promote — limiting, and in extreme cases, terminating, critical cancer research to punish universities are not representing their constituents, so many of whom suffer from this disease. Instead, they are allowing revenge on innocents to make a point that they can and will cause more human suffering unless university educators submit. It raises the question: What kind of government puts the lives of its own citizens at risk?

    If you must challenge an educational philosophy, then do so by challenging the educational programs that you deem unfairly progressive, not the research programs that have no political component. If you are convinced that a cancer research program is administratively bloated or worse, is fraudulently expending taxpayer dollars, then legally audit those expenditures and recoup those funds. 

    Don’t make my life and the lives of so many other cancer patients, along with the research programs we depend on, collateral damage.

    Richard Allen: is a patient at Dana Farber Cancer Institute and a retired lawyer. He has a master’s in civil engineering from the University of Washington and began his engineering career in Seattle.



    Source link

    Team_NationalNewsBrief
    • Website

    Keep Reading

    Opinion | What Body Cam Footage Reveals About ICE’s Tactics

    Opinion | The Supreme Court Should Stop ICE From Racially Profiling

    Opinion | I Played Putin in a War Game. He Could Invade Again.

    Opinion | The Economy, Immigration and Regret: 12 Trump Voters Discuss

    Opinion | What We Got Right — and Wrong — in ‘Abundance’

    The pope schools the ‘secretary of war’

    Add A Comment

    Comments are closed.

    Editors Picks

    Los Angeles ‘Red Flag’ wildfire warnings expire, but dangers persist

    January 16, 2025

    AI Pioneer Fei-Fei Li Has a Vision for Computer Vision

    December 14, 2024

    5 Key Steps to Succeed as a First-Time Manager

    January 4, 2025

    My e-bike was stolen in Seattle. Here’s what happened next

    December 8, 2025

    Mexico Launches Employment Program | Armstrong Economics

    April 28, 2025
    Categories
    • Arts & Entertainment
    • Business
    • International
    • Latest News
    • Lifestyle
    • Opinions
    • Politics
    • Science
    • Sports
    • Technology
    • Top Stories
    • Trending News
    • World Economy
    About us

    Welcome to National News Brief, your one-stop destination for staying informed on the latest developments from around the globe. Our mission is to provide readers with up-to-the-minute coverage across a wide range of topics, ensuring you never miss out on the stories that matter most.

    At National News Brief, we cover World News, delivering accurate and insightful reports on global events and issues shaping the future. Our Tech News section keeps you informed about cutting-edge technologies, trends in AI, and innovations transforming industries. Stay ahead of the curve with updates on the World Economy, including financial markets, economic policies, and international trade.

    Editors Picks

    Starmer’s Collapse Is A Vote Against Policy Failure

    April 29, 2026

    Kris Jenner Denies Recent Facelift Reports

    April 29, 2026

    Kevin Warsh one step closer to becoming Fed chair after Senate committee approval

    April 29, 2026

    Over 1.2m in Lebanon expected to face acute hunger: UN-backed report | Food News

    April 29, 2026
    Categories
    • Arts & Entertainment
    • Business
    • International
    • Latest News
    • Lifestyle
    • Opinions
    • Politics
    • Science
    • Sports
    • Technology
    • Top Stories
    • Trending News
    • World Economy
    • Privacy Policy
    • Disclaimer
    • Terms and Conditions
    • About us
    • Contact us
    Copyright © 2024 Nationalnewsbrief.com All Rights Reserved.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.