Close Menu
    National News Brief
    Sunday, May 10
    • Home
    • Business
    • Lifestyle
    • Science
    • Technology
    • International
    • Arts & Entertainment
    • Sports
    National News Brief
    Home»Science

    How worried should you be about screentime?

    Team_NationalNewsBriefBy Team_NationalNewsBriefDecember 9, 2025 Science No Comments5 Mins Read
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email


    Marco_Piunti/Getty Images

    Wait, stop scrolling! How long have you been on your phone today? Is social media rotting your brain? We are constantly asking questions like these, but just how worried should you be about your screen time?

    There are literally hundreds of thousands of studies looking at screen time, and many of them have found links between using screens and a huge variety of health issues, including depression, anxiety, poor sleep, obesity, diabetes and even suicide. It all sounds pretty bad.

    There’s just one question: are screens themselves causing these issues, or is poor health causing increased screen time? Or could there even be an unknown, third factor influencing both?

    The vast majority of these studies can’t tell you, because they merely show a correlation between screen time and health. Identifying causation – the real impact screen time is having – is much harder.

    To get to the bottom of this, researchers conduct meta-analyses that pull together hundreds of high-quality studies using more advanced statistical techniques. Doing this, a lot of the harm seems to disappear.

    My favourite such meta-analysis – yes, of course I have a favourite meta-analysis – was conducted in 2019. The researchers, Amy Orben and Andrew Przybylski, both then at the University of Oxford, looked at a huge dataset of questionnaires given to teenagers, allowing them to compare the effects of more than 20,000 different factors on the participants’ mental health.

    Crunching the numbers, they found that only 0.4 per cent of adolescent well-being was related to screen use, a level of negative effect comparable to eating potatoes. By comparison, being bullied was associated with more than four times this negative effect, while getting enough sleep and eating a good breakfast were associated with much larger positive effects.

    “
    What the data seems to be telling us is that on average – on a population level – the positive and negative effects of screens are small
    “

    So, screen time is fine? Well, again, let’s not be so hasty. Despite putting the links between screen time and mental health in context with other factors, these are still only correlations. People’s lives are messy, and extracting causation from messy data is hard.

    One way to unpick the noise might be to ask what we actually mean by screen time. Watching TV, scrolling through social media on your phone, playing video games, reading an e-book or listening to a science journalist talk about screen time all involve staring at a screen, but would we expect them all to have the same impact on our health?

    Many studies don’t take a particularly sophisticated approach to this question, simply counting up the number of hours spent looking at a screen – and to make matters worse, this data is often self-reported, which we know makes it less likely to be accurate. (Come on, we all lie about it.)

    Even if we focus on just social media, that encompasses so many things. Arguing about politics on X until 3am and messaging your friends on WhatsApp are both examples of using social media, but do they have the same effect? A meta-analysis published in 2024 in the journal SSM – Mental Health attempted to tease this out, finding small positive correlations between well-being and using social media for communication or having lots of social media-based friends. It also found small negative correlations with comparing yourself with others on social media or with problematic social media use – what we might call “being addicted” to social media. None of that sounds particularly surprising, right?

    Where, then, does that leave us? Given the potential risk for harm, we could adopt the precautionary principle, particularly when it comes to children. We could heavily restrict their screen time or even introduce bans on certain types of tech use, like social media, as the UK and Australian governments are doing.

    But I worry that doing this could see us miss out on the benefits of screen time – information, social connection, entertainment and more. What the data seems to be telling us, as much as we can glean through all the noise, is that on average – on a population level – the positive and negative effects of screens are small. That doesn’t mean there aren’t some people who experience much larger harms – those problematic users I talked about before – and we need to understand much more to help them.

    Considering all that, how worried should you be about screen time? The answer is a complex one, based on still-evolving research. If you find screens interfering with your life in a major way, changing behaviour might be useful, as could seeking medical advice. For most of us, though, screen use shouldn’t be particularly high on your list of worries – and certainly not as high as headlines might leave you to believe.

    Topics:



    Source link

    Team_NationalNewsBrief
    • Website

    Keep Reading

    Slow breathing can calm the mind without any need for mindfulness

    Smart underwear detects lactose intolerance by tracking your farts

    There has been a sudden increase in the rate of sea level rise

    US government releases huge batch of UFO files

    A vast dam across the Bering Strait could stop the AMOC collapsing

    Fire is spreading in the Chernobyl exclusion zone after drone crash

    Add A Comment

    Comments are closed.

    Editors Picks

    Double Your Impact This Giving Tuesday on 3 December

    November 22, 2024

    India’s budget bets on infrastructure, manufacturing amid global trade war | Business and Economy News

    February 1, 2026

    Trump officials dig in on Minneapolis shooting narrative despite video evidence

    January 25, 2026

    Israel insists it calls shots in Gaza despite truce

    October 26, 2025

    Leonardo DiCaprio’s Sneaker Investment Nears $4M Loss

    May 3, 2026
    Categories
    • Arts & Entertainment
    • Business
    • International
    • Latest News
    • Lifestyle
    • Opinions
    • Politics
    • Science
    • Sports
    • Technology
    • Top Stories
    • Trending News
    • World Economy
    About us

    Welcome to National News Brief, your one-stop destination for staying informed on the latest developments from around the globe. Our mission is to provide readers with up-to-the-minute coverage across a wide range of topics, ensuring you never miss out on the stories that matter most.

    At National News Brief, we cover World News, delivering accurate and insightful reports on global events and issues shaping the future. Our Tech News section keeps you informed about cutting-edge technologies, trends in AI, and innovations transforming industries. Stay ahead of the curve with updates on the World Economy, including financial markets, economic policies, and international trade.

    Editors Picks

    Hantavirus-stricken cruise ship arrives in Tenerife

    May 10, 2026

    How To Distinguish A Real Bull Market

    May 10, 2026

    Alec Baldwin Reportedly Remains ‘Very Affected’ By ‘Rust’ Tragedy

    May 10, 2026

    Hantavirus-hit cruise ship arrives in Spain’s Canary Islands

    May 10, 2026
    Categories
    • Arts & Entertainment
    • Business
    • International
    • Latest News
    • Lifestyle
    • Opinions
    • Politics
    • Science
    • Sports
    • Technology
    • Top Stories
    • Trending News
    • World Economy
    • Privacy Policy
    • Disclaimer
    • Terms and Conditions
    • About us
    • Contact us
    Copyright © 2024 Nationalnewsbrief.com All Rights Reserved.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.